Skip to content
Claude by Anthropic app icon

Productivity · by Anthropic PBC

Claude by Anthropic Meta Ads & Creative Strategy

Ads refreshed July 27, 2026 · Meta Ad Library 8 retired

4.71739★ 211,009 ratings View on the App Store ↗

Every long-running ad Claude by Anthropic runs on Facebook & Instagram — pulled from the public Meta Ad Library, x-rayed by the same system that runs ad accounts autonomously.

Active ads

503

Winning set

36

30+ days live

Longest live

52d

App rating

4.72★

211K ratings

Brand palette

Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 1Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 2Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 3Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 4Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 5Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 6Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 7Claude by Anthropic App Store screenshot 8

The short version

Key facts

  • As of July 27, 2026, Claude by Anthropic runs 503 active ads in Meta's Ad Library across Facebook and Instagram; 36 of them have survived 30 or more days of continuous delivery.
  • Its longest-running ad has been live for 52 days.
  • The winning set splits 69% video, 28% static, 3% carousel.
  • The most common message angle is problem callout, carried by 36% of the winning set.
  • The winning ads speak mainly to Late-Night Software Engineer (36% of ads) and Startup Team Lead (22%).
  • All winning copy runs in English.
  • In App Store reviews, the loudest praise goes to response quality & intelligence (11% of mentions) and the loudest complaint is usage & rate limits (25%).
  • The App Store listing holds 4.71739 stars across 211,009 ratings.

The winning set

Live Meta ads gallery

36 ads have survived 30+ days of continuous delivery, out of 503 currently active. Deduped by creative, that's 28 unique units below; the ×N badge counts the ads running each one. Tap to play, or open the Ad Library record. Sorted by longest live: the account's most proven creatives lead, podium first.

The x-ray — every winner analyzed frame by frame

What the winning set is actually doing

Language distribution — where the winning set actually runs

Share of the winning set per copy language. Translation is a deliberate spend decision: a language earning survivors is a market the money already believes in.

English

100% · 36 ads

English English — 100% (36 ads)

Format split — statics vs video in the winning set

What survives 30+ days by medium.

video 25 ads · 69%

static 10 ads · 28%

carousel 1 ads · 3%

Persona coverage — who the winning ads speak to

HyperScale agents read Claude by Anthropic's buyer personas out of the winning set itself, then tagged every ad with the buyer it addresses.

Late-Night Software Engineer

36% · 13 ads

Late-Night Software Engineer — 36% coverage Late-Night Software Engineer — 36% (13 ads)

Startup Team Lead

22% · 8 ads

Startup Team Lead — 22% coverage Startup Team Lead — 22% (8 ads)

Reflective Deep Thinker

17% · 6 ads

Reflective Deep Thinker — 17% coverage Reflective Deep Thinker — 17% (6 ads)

Eng-Adjacent Automator

11% · 4 ads

Eng-Adjacent Automator — 11% coverage Eng-Adjacent Automator — 11% (4 ads)

Creative Partner Seeker

8% · 3 ads

Creative Partner Seeker — 8% coverage Creative Partner Seeker — 8% (3 ads)

DIY Non-Coder Automator

6% · 2 ads

DIY Non-Coder Automator — 6% coverage DIY Non-Coder Automator — 6% (2 ads)

Every x-rayed creative is tagged individually (who it sells to, its angle) from its HyperScale x-ray: transcript, casting, story beats. Coverage counts the ads each creative carries.

Angle mix — what the money says works

Every winner tagged with the message angle it leads with, and the languages it runs in — longevity under spend is the only public vote that counts.

problem callout

36% · 13 ads

problem callout problem callout — 36% (13 ads) EN

slow thinking transformation

17% · 6 ads

slow thinking transformation slow thinking transformation — 17% (6 ads) EN

f1 partnership

14% · 5 ads

f1 partnership f1 partnership — 14% (5 ads) EN

build your own tool

8% · 3 ads

build your own tool build your own tool — 8% (3 ads) EN

creative partner testimonial

8% · 3 ads

creative partner testimonial creative partner testimonial — 8% (3 ads) EN

cross-team adoption

8% · 3 ads

cross-team adoption cross-team adoption — 8% (3 ads) EN

The full winning set, read from the creatives themselves — 36 analyzed winners, hook by hook.

Days live Ads Lang Angle Persona Opening hook On-screen headline Length
×3 en build your own tool DIY Non-Coder Automator What's the difference between this and this? My inbox was three years of complete chaos. 76s
×1 en build your own tool Eng-Adjacent Automator It's cool like it's Google search, but the problem is it doesn't work while I sleep. Jeremiah returns! 58s
×3 en build your own tool DIY Non-Coder Automator I built a tool that roasts your thesis statement like a brutally honest Oxford professor. 58s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker A woman holds a small, black radio with a sticky note labeled 'THE VOICE' and turns the dial, looking confused. The AI for problem solvers. 44s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker We need to rebel against time by thinking slower. The AI for problem solvers. 58s
×3 en creative partner testimonial Creative Partner Seeker The most important thing I have learned as a creator is to slow down. The AI for problem solvers. 49s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker Can you hear me? Can you hear me? The AI for problem solvers. 44s
×3 en creative partner testimonial Creative Partner Seeker The most important thing I have learned as a creator is to slow down. The AI for problem solvers. 50s
×4 en problem callout Late-Night Software Engineer Here for Hashing... Here for Hashing... 5s
×4 en problem callout Late-Night Software Engineer Here for the merge conflict Here for the merge conflict 6s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker A woman holds a small, black radio with a sticky note labeled 'THE VOICE' and turns the dial, looking confused. The AI for problem solvers. 44s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker We need to rebel against time by thinking slower. The AI for problem solvers. 58s
×3 en slow thinking transformation Reflective Deep Thinker We need to rebel against time by thinking slower. The AI for problem solvers. 58s
×3 en creative partner testimonial Creative Partner Seeker The most important thing I have learned as a creator is to slow down. The AI for problem solvers. 49s
×3 en problem callout Late-Night Software Engineer Here for Hashing... Here for Hashing... 5s

Creative strategy

The dissection

Of 503 active Meta ads for Claude, only 36 survive past 30 days, and this week added 11 new winners while retiring 8. The longest-runner, 52 days, comes from build your own tool, an angle with just 3 ads total, while the real workhorse is a ~5-second, no-people product clip opening 13 of 36 winners with a blunt problem callout.

Five Seconds of App, Zero People

Problem callout is the account's workhorse: 13 of 36 winning ads (9 x-rayed creatives) run this exact shot, a roughly 5-second video with no presenter at all, just product and app footage on screen. That's a deliberate break from the account's own casting norm: presenters appear on camera in 65% of the 26 x-rayed creatives, meaning this angle is the one place Claude lets the interface do the talking instead of a person.

Two Runtimes, One Casting Split

Slow thinking transformation (6 ads, 4 creatives) runs long at ~58 seconds behind a female 25-34 presenter, while F1 partnership (5 ads, 4 creatives) runs tight at ~29 seconds behind a male 25-34 presenter, the same two demographics making up 15 of the 26 x-rayed creatives' on-camera casts (9 male 25-34, 6 female 25-34). Runtime bends per angle; who's cast barely does.

One Ad, One Angle, 52 Days

Build your own tool carries just 3 ads, yet it holds the corpus's single longest-runner at 52 days: the 'three years of email chaos' Gmail story built with Google Apps Script and Claude Opus. Its adjacent personas are thin too, DIY Non-Coder Automator at 2 ads and Eng-Adjacent Automator at 4 ads, proof one execution can carry an angle far past what its ad count would suggest.

Sixteen Ads Still Say Nothing

Of 13 unique primary texts in the whole corpus, 16 ads run literally '(no body video)', plus 3 '(no body dco)' and 2 '(no body image)', 21 blank-copy ads before counting anything else. Only 5 ads carry the Claude Code 'leveled up' partnership line, and just 2 run the F1 line 'Debuting the Pattern of Thought.' Copy is nearly absent from most of what's winning.

What Reviewers Say, Ads Don't

Across 2,342 reviews (4.72★ lifetime), usage/rate limits draw 85 mentions and reliability/crashes draw 75, with pricing value close behind at 49. Reviewers describe caps hitting fast 'even on paid Pro/Max tiers' and outages that undercut any reliability claim. None of the 36 winning ads mention limits, crashes, or price at all.

What we'd test next

  • Produce a ~5-second, no-people product-footage video using a pattern interrupt hook (the format behind problem callout's 13 winning ads) for the cross-team adoption angle (3 ads), targeting the Startup Team Lead persona (8 ads, the largest persona pool without its own signature execution).
  • Recast the slow thinking transformation angle's ~58-second testimonial format with a male 25-34 presenter, currently cast only in F1 partnership, instead of the female 25-34 lead, testing the account's underused casting split against the Reflective Deep Thinker persona (6 ads).
  • Test a side-by-side before/after comparison cut, a mechanic absent from the six hook types logged (pattern interrupt, testimonial, relatable developer pain point, celebrity endorsement, text-based problem statement, philosophical question), built for the build your own tool angle (3 ads, holder of the 52-day longest-runner) targeting the Eng-Adjacent Automator persona (4 ads).
  • Test a carousel execution, just 3% of the 26 x-rayed creatives, paired with the testimonial mechanic (tied top at 6) for the creative partner testimonial angle (3 ads), targeting the Creative Partner Seeker persona (3 ads) that has zero carousel presence today.

The HyperScale batch

New ad concepts, generated for Claude by Anthropic

HyperScale agents are producing an original round of ad concepts for Claude by Anthropic, built from the winning angles above, the brand's real App Store assets, and what reviewers actually say. This page updates when the batch drops.

This analysis lives in a ready-made HyperScale workspace. If you work on Claude by Anthropic, it's yours: we hand it over personally, usually within a day.

Customer voice — 2224 recent reviews analyzed

What reviewers actually say

Objections the ads must pre-empt

  • Rate/usage limits often hit within minutes, even on paid Pro/Max plans
  • Server outages and crashes make the app unusable for hours at a time
  • Accounts can be suspended or age-verified/banned without warning or support response
  • Pricing is seen as high relative to the limited number of messages allowed
  • Support is slow or automated, with users waiting days for a human reply

Review-theme mix

Share of analyzed review mentions per theme — + praise, − complaint, ~ mixed. Themes, not individual reviews.

usage & rate limits

25% · 85

usage & rate limits usage & rate limits — 25% (85 mentions): Even paying customers hit message caps within minutes and must wait hours to continue, which feels stingy for the price.

pricing value

14% · 49

pricing value pricing value — 14% (49 mentions): Many feel they're paying premium prices ($20-$200/mo) for far less usage than expected.

reliability & crashes

22% · 75

reliability & crashes reliability & crashes — 22% (75 mentions): Users report frequent crashes, glitches, errors sending messages, and server downtime that breaks workflows.

~ competitor comparison

10% · 33

competitor comparison competitor comparison — 10% (33 mentions): Many switched from ChatGPT, Gemini, or Grok, saying Claude is smarter, more honest, and less 'parasitic.'

+ response quality & intelligence

11% · 38

response quality & intelligence response quality & intelligence — 11% (38 mentions): Praised for clear, concise, well-thought-out, and accurate answers that feel like talking to a smart partner.

account bans & support

7% · 23

account bans & support account bans & support — 7% (23 mentions): Users describe sudden account suspensions or bans with no explanation and unresponsive support.

+ productivity impact

7% · 24

productivity impact productivity impact — 7% (24 mentions): Customers say Claude multiplies their output, handling 80% of workload so they can focus on strategy.

voice input & app bugs

5% · 19

voice input & app bugs voice input & app bugs — 5% (19 mentions): Voice transcription and input bar issues frustrate users trying to dictate longer prompts.

“Claude changed my career by multiplying my hourly rate by 20x and empowering me to accomplish previously impossible tasks”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“I'm able to outsource 80% of my projects to an intelligent thought partner”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“I'm able to outsource 80% of my projects to an intelligent thought partner”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Claude changed my career by multiplying my hourly rate by 20x and empowering me to accomplish previously impossible tasks”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“I basically have a super intelligent PA 24 hours of the day!”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“realizar el 80% del trabajo pesado u operativo y tú dedicarte a la estrategia”

5★ · App Store review · CO

“won me one tax review and a 34k deductible, and a small court case”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“realizar el 80% del trabajo pesado u operativo y tú dedicarte a la estrategia”

5★ · App Store review · CO

“Excellent user help for Powershell, 97% accurate in suggested code.”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“won me one tax review and a 34k deductible, and a small court case”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“Excellent user help for Powershell, 97% accurate in suggested code.”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“remarkable ability to read documents and retain information and responses are clear, concise and natural”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Far more competent than gpt, far less parasitic than gpt.”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Much more capable, quality work, no hallucinations”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“remarkable ability to read documents and retain information and responses are clear, concise and natural”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Claude mogs chatgpt and every other ai to another dimension”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“opus4.6 is kind and honest unlike openai”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“infinitely better than the insufferable personality of ChatGPT 5.2”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“opus4.6 is kind and honest unlike openai”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“Claude mogs chatgpt and every other ai to another dimension”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“Claude is better than ChatGPT in some ways and overall if I had to pick one, I'd say Claude is the best at the moment”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“Claude is the adult in the room while ChatGPT is your frenemy”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Far more competent than gpt, far less parasitic than gpt.”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Claude is better than ChatGPT in some ways and overall if I had to pick one, I'd say Claude is the best at the moment”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“I thought ChatGPT was awesome. Then I started to play around with Claude, then really use it seriously and it blew my mind”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Ich finde Claude toll und 200% besser als ChatGPT”

5★ · App Store review · AT

“I basically have a super intelligent PA 24 hours of the day!”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“Claude is the adult in the room while ChatGPT is your frenemy”

5★ · App Store review · AU

“One prompt like "continue" and straight away it states usage limit reached and I'm forced to wait 5 hours”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Switched to a paid subscription on Claude instead of ChatGPT. Claude is vastly better and more intelligent.”

5★ · App Store review · CA

“How is this still acceptable to be paying over $200 a month and I can only get in 5 - 7 questions at best every 5 hours!!!”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Got THREE prompts out of the basic model and ran out of messages and need to wait 5 hours. This is ridiculous”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“within less than 5 minutes hit a rate limit on the Pro plan”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“Got THREE prompts out of the basic model and ran out of messages and need to wait 5 hours. This is ridiculous”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“Claude has so many limits its so bad on the free version you get like 30 messages which sounds good but if your like me you will run out fast”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“How is this still acceptable to be paying over $200 a month and I can only get in 5 - 7 questions at best every 5 hours!!!”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Paying 35 Aud a month for 2-3 questions every 3 hrs”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Usage is extremely limited for what you pay. Upload a couple of images, ask a couple of questions and you are done”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“How we can create a good project or something good whit like 4 text per days?”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“Even with max $175/month, can't get files off, no MS word capacity, have to copy & paste in small paragraphs”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“server outages lasting several hours occur frequently, and despite charging at least $34 per month, there are many times when the service is completely unusable”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“server outages lasting several hours occur frequently, and despite charging at least $34 per month, there are many times when the service is completely unusable”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Now it's like other platforms. Hallucinating. Losing a days work. Just forgot the chat. Crashing.”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Now it's like other platforms. Hallucinating. Losing a days work. Just forgot the chat. Crashing.”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“the app is full of bugs. I constantly have to retry my prompts or sometimes close the app and reopen it”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Claude has gone downhill rapidly, guessing servers can't handle the popularity. Constant glitches and no longer works in my phone”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“Crashes and shuts down clause with 17 pro”

2★ · App Store review · CA

“I paid for a 3 month subscription and can't even access it anymore”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“i got banned for being "underage". im 18”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“1 day into using claude the account got banned, how ridiculous”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“i got banned for being "underage". im 18”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“They disabled my account immediately after I logged in and because of that I lost my 1 year subscription”

1★ · App Store review · AU

“En el computador por el mismo servicio me sale en 68k la versión pro y acá en teléfono para la misma versión conectada a la misma cuenta quieren cobrarme casi 100k”

1★ · App Store review · CO

“I was told I would be connected to a human but have to assume that something went wrong there too, nobody has contacted me in 3 days”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“if you sign up for Claude via Apple, it will be charged an extra $35 a month because it's through Apple. If you do it through their website it's $35 cheaper”

1★ · App Store review · CA

“the input bar completely disappears with my 5minute voice transcription is actually insane and beyond frustrating”

1★ · App Store review · CA

The market around it

Keep exploring the radar

More Meta ads teardowns

Browse all 69 apps on the radar · All Productivity teardowns

Quick answers

FAQ

How many Claude ads are running on Meta, and how many are actually winning?

503 active ads sit in Meta's Ad Library right now; only 36 have survived past the 30-day mark Radar treats as a winner. This week added 11 new winners and retired 8 since 2026-07-21.

What angle and format is working best for Claude right now?

Problem callout leads with 13 of 36 winning ads (9 x-rayed creatives): a ~5-second, no-people video of pure product/app footage. Slow thinking transformation (6 ads, ~58s, female-led) and F1 partnership (5 ads, ~29s, male-led) trail behind.

What languages and platforms do the winning Claude ads run on?

All 36 winning ads run in English only, none in other languages yet. They span video, dco, image, and carousel formats across Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Threads, and Audience Network.

What do Claude reviewers complain about that the ads don't address?

Across 2,342 reviews (4.72★ lifetime), usage/rate limits draw 85 mentions and reliability/crashes draw 75, with pricing value at 49. None of the 36 winning ads mention limits, crashes, or price at all.

Sources: Meta Ad Library (ad creatives, start dates, active status; each ad links to its Library record), Apple's public App Store listing and customer-reviews feeds, and company-reported figures where noted. Review quotes are verbatim from public App Store reviews.

This is an independent editorial analysis by HyperScale, published for informational and commentary purposes. HyperScale is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Anthropic PBC. The ad concepts in “The HyperScale batch” are AI-generated by HyperScale and are not the work of Anthropic PBC. Trademarks belong to their owners. Rights holders can request changes or removal via hyperscale.net.